English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 2928/5721 (51%)
造訪人次 : 375613      線上人數 : 331
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://ir.lib.ncut.edu.tw/handle/987654321/2817


    題名: Comparison the Capabilities of Two Process Using Cpm
    作者: Chen, J.P.;Chen, K. S.
    日期: 2004
    上傳時間: 2009-08-20 10:22:10 (UTC+8)
    摘要: The indices Cp and Cpk are extensively used to assess process capability. However, they only take into
    account the process mean and standard deviation, but not the proximity of the process mean to the target
    value, T, of the process characteristic. Cp,m does take into account the proximity of the process mean to
    the target value. We propose a method for selecting or judging the better of two suppliers or processes
    based on a confidence interval for the ratio Cpml/Cpm2. Four methods of obtaining approximate confidence
    intervals are presented and compared, one based on the statistical theory given in Boyles (1991) and three
    based on the bootstrap, (referred to as SB (standard bootstrap), PB (percentile bootstrap), and BCPB
    (biased-corrected percentile bootstrap)). The performance was compared using simulation, which showed
    that, in two independent and normal process environments, Boyles's (1991) confidence interval and the SB
    confidence interval are more reliable than the PB and BCPB methods. A sample size of greater than 50 is
    recommended for selecting the most capable of two suppliers or processes.
    關聯: Journal of Quality Technology, 36(3), 329-335
    顯示於類別:[工業工程與管理系(所)] 【工業工程與管理系所】期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    沒有與此文件相關的檔案.



    在NCUTIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋